[Wactclc-alma] [EXTERNAL*]- counting databases for ACRL stats

[Guidry, Wade]

Ryer, regarding this question:

Does anyone have any good insights into why our digital serials count is much lower than last year? I would expect growth. We haven't eliminated any big databases or collections.

What numbers are you comparing, and how were they generated?

If you’re looking at the analytics IPEDS dashboard, the electronic collection tag defaults to content activated prior to July 1, 2021, since the relevant reporting period for current IPEDS cycle is July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021.

However, electronic collections can be tricky, in that if you remove and reactivate a big collection after that date, the activation date will be after July 1, 2021, and so won’t be counted.

You can just use the date prompt to set the date to the current date to include those reactivated collections. Though you may end up counting titles that weren’t activated in the reporting FY.




Wade Guidry
Library Consortium Services Manager, WACTCLC
wadeg at bigbend.edu<mailto:wadeg at bigbend.edu>
(509) 760-4474
http://www.wactclc.org<http://www.wactclc.org/>

From: Wactclc-alma <wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu> On Behalf Of Ryer Banta
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:24 PM
To: WACTCLC Alma Discussion <wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu>
Subject: Re: [Wactclc-alma] [EXTERNAL*]- counting databases for ACRL stats

CAUTION: Originated outside our network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you validate the sender.


This is timely, we're finally getting into IPEDS right now too. Good luck to us all doing this.

Did something change in the instructions this year that you are now including the open access collections?

In the past, like you, we've counted up databases from our A-Z database list, excluding OA ones there and in Alma. I believe we were under the impression that OA collections were not to be included in the past. But we may have been misunderstanding all along.

Does anyone have any good insights into why our digital serials count is much lower than last year? I would expect growth. We haven't eliminated any big databases or collections.

Ryer Banta
Information Literacy and Technology Librarian
Pronouns: he/him/his
Centralia College
360-623-8121
Ryer.Banta at centralia.edu<https://mail.centralia.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=fNEFFUiOcJn8XZD_VNaqVEixJx9QWtNlXDDsY0izFrXf1xAoVYvYCA..&URL=mailto%3aRyer.Banta%40centralia.edu>
Schedule an Appointment<https://centralia.libcal.com/appointments/ryer>
________________________________
From: Wactclc-alma <wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu<mailto:wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu>> on behalf of Martin, Melinda <Melinda.Martin at scc.spokane.edu<mailto:Melinda.Martin at scc.spokane.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 11:37 AM
To: WACTCLC Alma Discussion <wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu<mailto:wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Wactclc-alma] [EXTERNAL*]- counting databases for ACRL stats


We also count JSTOR as a single database.

😊

_Melinda



From: Wactclc-alma <wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu<mailto:wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu>> On Behalf Of Elena Bianco
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 11:27 AM
To: WACTCLC Alma Discussion <wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu<mailto:wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Wactclc-alma] [EXTERNAL*]- counting databases for ACRL stats



Hi Amy:



We count JSTOR as just one…



Elena



Elena Bianco, Systems & Technical Services Librarian

Skagit Valley College

2405 E. College Way

Mount Vernon, WA 98273

(360)416-7624



From: Wactclc-alma <wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu<mailto:wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu>> On Behalf Of Herman, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 11:04 AM
To: WACTCLC Alma Discussion <wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu<mailto:wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL*]-[Wactclc-alma] counting databases for ACRL stats



For those of you who help gather the stats for your library’s ACRL report (or IPEDS), how do you calculate the number of electronic databases your library offers?  In the past I have manually counted from our A-Z list.  Our A-Z list breaks out ProQuest and Ebsco databases into their many unique pieces because those pieces can be searched independently (or altogether), but we only count ScienceDirect and JSTOR as single databases because their multiple pieces can’t be broken out for search, independently.



This year I am switching to going off of my active collections list in Alma because it also contains all of the open access collections that I have activated for search in Primo, which the instructions say to include.  However, ScienceDirect and JSTOR are actually broken out into their multiple pieces on my Alma list.  I’m curious if you have JSTOR, for example, do you count it as a single database?  Or as it’s multiple parts (we subscribe to 7 parts)?  Thanks!



Any other related thoughts?



Thanks!



Amy Herman

Library Faculty | Olympic College

1600 Chester Avenue | Bremerton, WA 98337

aherman at olympic.edu<mailto:aherman at olympic.edu>




This email is not from a Skagit Valley College email address. As such, the SVC IT Department cannot ensure its safety. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking on links, or responding to this email..



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ctc.edu/pipermail/wactclc-alma_lists.ctc.edu/attachments/20220310/67438d11/attachment.html>