[Wactclc-alma] Anonymization issue which I don't think we discussed yet

Guidry, Wade WadeG at bigbend.edu
Thu Sep 28 14:47:59 PDT 2017


Dale and all,

I might know why you are seeing this…

It could be because of the “retain last loan” anonymization rule you have in place.

If all of those items showing up on the ‘returns’ tab of those users have not be checked out again yet, that loan transaction is retained until someone else checks the item out.

I checked out an item on my record that was previously checked out and returned by one of your examples.

I’ll check tomorrow, after the anonymization job has run, to see if that return disappears from the user’s account.






[Title: Big Bend Community College Logo]

Wade Guidry
Library Consortium Services Manager
Big Bend Community College
wadeg at bigbend.edu<mailto:wadeg at bigbend.edu>

509.760.4474
www.bigbend.edu<http://www.bigbend.edu/>

Big Bend Community College • 7662 Chanute Street NE • Moses Lake, WA 98837-3299


WACTCLC Alma Instance: Alma NA02<http://status.exlibrisgroup.com/>
WACTCLC Primo Instance: Primo NA08<http://status.exlibrisgroup.com/>

From: Wactclc-alma [mailto:wactclc-alma-bounces at lists.ctc.edu] On Behalf Of Dale Burke
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:34 PM
To: WACTCLC Alma Discussion <wactclc-alma at lists.ctc.edu>
Subject: [Wactclc-alma] Anonymization issue which I don't think we discussed yet

Hello all,

Edmonds was under the belief that our anonymization rules were working correctly; however, we have recently discovered a new wrinkle.

Loans are being anonymized as we expected; however, returns are not being anonymized.  If we look at a patron record we no longer see what the patron checked out, but we do see everything they returned, so one can assumed that if they returned an item they probably checked it out.  Anonymizing only half of the transaction doesn't seem useful.

We have looked around and think we have everything coded correctly, but still wonder if we missed something or if Alma isn't considering returns as part of the anonymization process.

Anyone else seeing the same thing?

Thanks!

Dale Burke
Technical Services Librarian
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B16tUjXHMjfkeVd6QnJvakN3WEk&revid=0B16tUjXHMjfkUGVnOUFiNzF6RENiODhNdWZPRmtVb291Zk9JPQ]
20000 68th Ave. W
Lynnwood, WA  98036
425-640-1526<tel:(425)%20640-1526>
dburke at email.edcc.edu<mailto:dburke at email.edcc.edu>
[https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ctc.edu/pipermail/wactclc-alma_lists.ctc.edu/attachments/20170928/d853a3f0/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12948 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://lists.ctc.edu/pipermail/wactclc-alma_lists.ctc.edu/attachments/20170928/d853a3f0/attachment-0002.png>


More information about the Wactclc-alma mailing list